Kirel
March 28, 2002, 12:22pm
241
Originally posted by LeonMcNichols A_f remember the movies where one person has a small hole on the front of the head yet the back of the skull has a hole the size of a grapefruit
The reason for this is either a low-velocity round, or a hollow-point or some other specialty ammunition, which will deform and spread out, leaving a small entrance wound and an enormous exit wound.
The reason that this ammunition was developed was because higher-velocity weapons would pass through a soft target, such as a human, without leaving anything but a small hole the diameter of the round.
Ahh…the technology of killing. Wonderful.
Good thing we don’t have anything better to focus on…like curing cancer…
KBV
March 28, 2002, 1:42pm
243
Things don’t go “boom” or spatter blood against walls when you’re curing cancer.
Gil
March 28, 2002, 2:04pm
244
Well technically killing someone does kill the cancerous cells, thereby curing them of cancer. So, I disagree.
KBV
March 28, 2002, 2:08pm
245
Joy! We need to get this cure working on a large scale immediately.
Originally posted by Gil Well technically killing someone does kill the cancerous cells, thereby curing them of cancer. So, I disagree.
Just like acid in the face cures your economic troubles.
KBV
March 28, 2002, 2:20pm
247
It is difficult to imagine a large-scale program involving putting acid on people’s faces. Therefore there is little fun involved. Killing wins.
Romsus
March 28, 2002, 3:42pm
248
Well, acid isn’t just applied to the face, it is thrown onto the face. Throwing is just more fun.
Yes, we don’t describe your “killing” as “placing bullets on people” because that would be boring.
KBV
March 28, 2002, 9:07pm
250
“Placing hydrogen plasma on people” becomes “throwing people into hydrogen plasma”. The alteration is an improvement.
Kirel
March 29, 2002, 8:53am
251
Yeah, but placing is different than throwing. Throwing is much better.
KBV
March 29, 2002, 8:57am
252
I think this has been agreed upon.
Kirel
March 29, 2002, 9:04am
253
Except in the case of land mines, of course. Or nitroglycerin.
KBV
March 29, 2002, 9:13am
254
But throwing nitroglycerin is fun! It goes boom!dynamite isn’t fun. You have to set that off for the fun to begin.
Originally posted by Spkarrer Yes, we don’t describe your “killing” as “placing bullets on people” because that would be boring.
indeed you’d be killing pople by lead poisining…
KBV
March 29, 2002, 8:53pm
256
Lead poisoning can be fun, too! Think Caligula.
Originally posted by KBV Think Caligula.
I can say I actually had the Original Uncut ver back in “88” true roman debauchery at it best !
KBV
March 29, 2002, 8:56pm
258
…
Romsus
March 29, 2002, 8:59pm
259
Originally posted by Kirel Except in the case of land mines, of course. Or nitroglycerin.
Why make people step on land mines when you can throw remote mines at them? Throwing is always better.
KBV
March 29, 2002, 9:03pm
260
Except in the case of mind control. Except… then you can tell people to throw stuff. So I am wrong, throwing is also better with mind control.